conversations with an unapologetic black liberal

Just another WordPress.com weblog

1. JR 5.11.09 / 8pm

   Why thedirty.com had to postpone upload the photo? It only took a couple minutes but took days to “make it right”. In other words, the pictures are photoshopped!

   My photoshop teacher can point out the area where it looks unnatural. Between the face & the hair, as well as between the shoulder and the chin. Day by day those photos have been “improved”. Good evil job.

   Reply
2. Dave Perrin BM3 5.11.09 / 9pm

   Every one Has the right to voice there opinion As said in the 1amendment

   Reply
3. blackliberal 5.11.09 / 10pm

   It wouldn’t surprise me if they were photoshopped but even if they weren’t who cares? It seems that everyone has naked photos out there these days and she shouldn’t have to give up her title for her views or for some naughty photos.

   Reply
4. jjoshuajj21 5.12.09 / 9am

   This is NOT an issue of civil rights, its a moral and ethical issue based on Liberty; and it is that gay judge that is interfering with the right of moral Christian people to pursue HAPPINESS. Moral Christian people just want to get away from something that is revolting, disgusting, and immoral. Moral Christians oppose that gay judge attacking one of their beautiful women, and their moral values, and that gay judge is making us unhappy with exposure to his disgusting immorality. Now, Just in case Donald Trump decides against Carrie Prejean, this should be the response of supporter’s for Carrie Prejean: Carrie’s RIGHT to support the (NOM) and marriage between a man and a woman is based on the Declaration Of Independence (that the USA is founded upon), which states that “We The People” have the inalienable rights to life, liberty, and the [ PURSUIT of HAPPINESS ]. In litigation thereafter, the U. S. Supreme Court declared in, ( Loving v. Virginia (1967) 388 U.S. 1 ); that, the freedom to marry is recognized as a vital [ PERSONAL RIGHT ] that is essential to the pursuit of happiness. As a result of this precedent, that gay judge has violated the liberty rights of Carrie Prejean, with a defamation of character, because she would not corrupt her Christian beliefs to obtain his vote. So, he condemned her pursuit of happiness, to marry a MAN, defamed her character, and destroyed her career objectives. The (NOM) can file suit against that gay judge; because, Carrie’s personal rights prevail over his need to corrupt her, and that gay judge is only motivated by personal bias and animosity against moral Christian values (Meyer v. Nebraska (1923) 262 US 390). You see, Carrie didn’t attack him, he attacked and slandered Carrie because she refused to corrupt herself to get his vote, and this the way it always is, gays are using their authority to deprive moral Christians of our personal liberty rights to pursue traditional Christian values. Another thing, why would a “Modern Woman” who is Liberated and Free, allow a sodomite to deprive her of the right to pursue happiness, as EQUALLY, as a gay sodomite does, in his sodomite life style?

   Reply
   1. HH 8.17.09 / 5pm

      Wow, and denying gays the right to marry isn’t infringing on their pursuit of happiness? I don’t think she should have been de-crowned for saying that, but saying that we have equal opportunity to pursue happiness is just wrong. Unfortunately we have a long way to go before that happens for minorities of almost any demographic.

      Reply

Blog at WordPress.com. | Theme: Hemingway

Entries RSS Comments RSS